<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Code Review on Coding Agent Guide</title><link>https://codingagentguide.com/tags/code-review/</link><description>Practical guides for AI coding Agent tutorials and operations.</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://codingagentguide.com/tags/code-review/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Keep Terminal Command Evidence Reviewable in Coding Agent Runs</title><link>https://codingagentguide.com/posts/terminal-command-evidence-for-coding-agent-reviews/</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 01:40:09 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://codingagentguide.com/posts/terminal-command-evidence-for-coding-agent-reviews/</guid><description>A practical way to capture terminal command evidence so coding agent changes can be reviewed without trusting a summary alone.</description></item><item><title>How to Keep the Writer and Reviewer Roles Separate When Coding Agents Use CometAPI</title><link>https://codingagentguide.com/posts/cometapi-writer-reviewer-separation-for-agent-content/</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 17:05:56 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://codingagentguide.com/posts/cometapi-writer-reviewer-separation-for-agent-content/</guid><description>Coding agents that both generate and approve their own output introduce subtle quality failures. This guide explains how to route writer and reviewer calls through CometAPI on separate paths, why the separation matters, and how to smoke-test the handoff before relying on it in production.</description></item><item><title>How to Gather and Use Multi-Model Review Evidence for Coding Agent Posts</title><link>https://codingagentguide.com/posts/multi-model-review-evidence-for-coding-agent-posts/</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 04:28:22 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://codingagentguide.com/posts/multi-model-review-evidence-for-coding-agent-posts/</guid><description>Learn a concrete workflow for collecting review evidence from multiple models before your coding agent posts code changes, covering setup, happy-path and error-path checks, logging fields, and gateway-backed evidence collection.</description></item><item><title>How to Produce Reviewable Diffs From Coding Agent Sessions</title><link>https://codingagentguide.com/posts/reviewable-diffs-for-coding-agent-sessions/</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 04:22:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://codingagentguide.com/posts/reviewable-diffs-for-coding-agent-sessions/</guid><description>A practical guide to structuring coding agent sessions so every change lands as a clean, reviewable diff — covering branch strategy, git worktree isolation, pull request conventions, and CI checks that keep human reviewers in control.</description></item><item><title>Multi-Model API Gateway Setup for Coding Agent Reviews</title><link>https://codingagentguide.com/posts/multi-model-api-gateway-setup-for-coding-agent-reviews/</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 01:46:53 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://codingagentguide.com/posts/multi-model-api-gateway-setup-for-coding-agent-reviews/</guid><description>A practical guide to routing coding agent code-review calls through a multi-model API gateway so that fast checks and deep analysis land on the right models, stay observable, and do not drift when upstream endpoints change.</description></item><item><title>How to Hand Off Coding Agent Pull Requests for Review</title><link>https://codingagentguide.com/posts/review-handoffs-for-coding-agent-pull-requests/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 03:31:45 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://codingagentguide.com/posts/review-handoffs-for-coding-agent-pull-requests/</guid><description>A practical checklist for handing a coding-agent pull request to reviewers with scope, checks, instruction context, risk notes, and clean pass/fail records.</description></item></channel></rss>